refactor CHPA hierarchy SQL
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,54 @@
|
||||
# REFACTOR-MA
|
||||
|
||||
Databricks 数仓 SQL 重构仓库。
|
||||
|
||||
## 首批 review 范围
|
||||
|
||||
本批次只重构原 `CHPA/01` 中两个层级维表脚本:
|
||||
|
||||
- `sql/chpa/01_dwd/01_dwd_ims_atc_hierarchy.sql`
|
||||
- `sql/chpa/01_dwd/02_dwd_ims_nfc_hierarchy.sql`
|
||||
|
||||
工作区 `CHPA/` 下的原脚本保持不变,便于逐项对照。
|
||||
|
||||
## 兼容性决策
|
||||
|
||||
首批代码继续写入现有物理表:
|
||||
|
||||
- `dwd.dwd_ims_atc_hierarchy`
|
||||
- `dwd.dwd_ims_nfc_hierarchy`
|
||||
|
||||
这样不会立即影响 pack property 和 DWS 等现有下游任务。推荐的新表名及迁移规则记录在 `docs/sql_refactoring_standard.md`;是否执行物理改名,待本批 review 后决定。
|
||||
|
||||
## 目录结构
|
||||
|
||||
```text
|
||||
RE/
|
||||
|-- README.md
|
||||
|-- docs/
|
||||
| `-- sql_refactoring_standard.md
|
||||
|-- sql/
|
||||
| `-- chpa/
|
||||
| `-- 01_dwd/
|
||||
| |-- 01_dwd_ims_atc_hierarchy.sql
|
||||
| `-- 02_dwd_ims_nfc_hierarchy.sql
|
||||
`-- validation/
|
||||
`-- chpa/
|
||||
`-- 01_dwd/
|
||||
`-- validate_hierarchy_refactor.sql
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## 执行顺序
|
||||
|
||||
1. 在覆盖目标表前运行 `validation/chpa/01_dwd/validate_hierarchy_refactor.sql`。
|
||||
2. 核对两个 `DESCRIBE TABLE` 结果;兼容性检查必须全部返回 `passed = true`。
|
||||
3. review 重复路径和未匹配层级指标,确认它们符合现有业务口径。
|
||||
4. 通过后,按文件名前缀顺序执行 `sql/chpa/01_dwd/` 中的重构脚本。
|
||||
|
||||
两个重构脚本都要求现有 DWD 源表、目标表已经创建。
|
||||
|
||||
## 本次 review 重点
|
||||
|
||||
1. 表命名模型是否适用于整个数仓。
|
||||
2. 物理表改名采用兼容视图还是一次性联动下游。
|
||||
3. 替换调度任务前,在 Databricks 中对比新旧结果的行数、业务键重复数和空键数。
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,119 @@
|
||||
# Databricks SQL 重构规范
|
||||
|
||||
## 1. 范围和原则
|
||||
|
||||
本规范适用于 CHPA Databricks 数仓脚本。第一阶段目标是在不改变业务结果的前提下提高可维护性。
|
||||
|
||||
- 先保持业务口径,再做性能优化。
|
||||
- 每个脚本只负责一个主要目标表。
|
||||
- 文件头声明源表、目标表、数据粒度、写入方式和依赖。
|
||||
- 持久化写入必须显式列出目标列和查询列,禁止使用 `SELECT *`。
|
||||
- 逻辑重构与生产表改名分开实施。
|
||||
- 为行数、唯一性、非空约束和未匹配记录建立验证查询或任务检查。
|
||||
|
||||
## 2. 文件和目录命名
|
||||
|
||||
目录结构统一为:
|
||||
|
||||
```text
|
||||
sql/<业务域>/<阶段>/<序号>_<目标表>.sql
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
规则:
|
||||
|
||||
- 目录和文件名使用小写 snake_case。
|
||||
- 路径和文件名不使用空格。
|
||||
- 使用两位序号明确 notebook/job 的执行顺序。
|
||||
- 一个脚本只写入一个主要持久化目标。像 `01 dwd_update.sql` 这种多目标脚本,应按目标表和职责拆分。
|
||||
|
||||
示例:
|
||||
|
||||
```text
|
||||
sql/chpa/01_dwd/01_dwd_ims_atc_hierarchy.sql
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## 3. 物理表命名
|
||||
|
||||
新表使用以下格式:
|
||||
|
||||
```text
|
||||
[<catalog>.]<分层_schema>.<来源系统>_<对象类型>_<业务实体>[_<限定词>]
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
未启用 Unity Catalog 或依赖默认 catalog 时可以省略 catalog。分层已经由 schema 表达,表名不再重复 `dwd`、`dws` 或 `dm`。
|
||||
|
||||
- 来源系统:如 `ims`、`gnd`、`pharbers`。
|
||||
- 对象类型:`td` 表示维度/主数据,`tf` 表示事实数据。
|
||||
- 业务实体:使用稳定的业务名词,如 `atc_hierarchy`、`pack_property`。
|
||||
- 限定词:按需表达粒度或变体,如 `monthly`、`province`。
|
||||
|
||||
`01` 组表名建议:
|
||||
|
||||
| 现有物理表名 | 推荐规范表名 | 首批处理方式 |
|
||||
| --- | --- | --- |
|
||||
| `dwd.dwd_ims_atc_hierarchy` | `dwd.ims_td_atc_hierarchy` | 保留现名 |
|
||||
| `dwd.dwd_ims_nfc_hierarchy` | `dwd.ims_td_nfc_hierarchy` | 保留现名 |
|
||||
| `dwd.dwd_ims_td_manufacturer_corp` | `dwd.ims_td_manufacturer_corporation` | 后续 review |
|
||||
| `dwd.dwd_ims_td_pack_property` | `dwd.ims_td_pack_property` | 后续 review |
|
||||
| `dwd.dwd_gnd_pharbers_prov_fact` | `dwd.pharbers_tf_province_sales` | 先确认业务粒度 |
|
||||
|
||||
推荐迁移顺序:
|
||||
|
||||
1. 创建规范名称的新表,并用兼容视图暴露旧表名。
|
||||
2. 新旧表并行运行,对比数据结果。
|
||||
3. 在一次受控发布中修改全部下游引用。
|
||||
4. 所有消费者迁移后再移除旧名称兼容视图。
|
||||
|
||||
## 4. 字段命名
|
||||
|
||||
- 新字段使用小写 snake_case。
|
||||
- 标识使用 `_id`,业务编码使用 `_code`,名称或描述使用 `_name`、`_description`。
|
||||
- 日期时间后缀按真实类型使用 `_date`、`_timestamp` 或 `_at`。
|
||||
- `atc`、`nfc`、`prod`、`pack` 等已形成业务共识或受输出契约约束的缩写可以保留。
|
||||
- 纯逻辑重构中不直接修改持久化输出字段名。
|
||||
|
||||
## 5. SQL 结构和格式
|
||||
|
||||
脚本统一按以下顺序组织:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Databricks notebook 标记和脚本契约头。
|
||||
2. 带显式目标列的 `INSERT OVERWRITE`。
|
||||
3. 源数据标准化 CTE。
|
||||
4. 业务规则 CTE。
|
||||
5. 按目标表字段顺序显式编写最终 `SELECT`。
|
||||
|
||||
格式规则:
|
||||
|
||||
- SQL 关键字使用大写。
|
||||
- CTE 和别名使用小写 snake_case。
|
||||
- 使用四个空格缩进。
|
||||
- `SELECT` 每行一个字段。
|
||||
- 每个 JOIN 条件单独成行。
|
||||
- 使用 `atc_level_1` 等有业务意义的别名,维护代码中不使用 `t1`、`a` 等无语义别名。
|
||||
- 同一作用域出现多个关系时,所有字段都带关系限定符。
|
||||
|
||||
## 6. 写入和数据质量规则
|
||||
|
||||
- 只有可确定性重跑的全量任务可以使用 `INSERT OVERWRITE`。
|
||||
- 不在一个脚本中混合无关的 `UPDATE` 和目标表构建逻辑。
|
||||
- 编码补零等标准化逻辑集中到一个明确的处理阶段,避免在多个任务中重复表达式。
|
||||
- 每个脚本必须声明预期目标粒度。
|
||||
- 最少验证以下指标:
|
||||
- 新结果与旧结果的总行数;
|
||||
- 声明业务键的重复数;
|
||||
- 必填键的空值数;
|
||||
- 层级关联新增的未匹配记录数。
|
||||
|
||||
## 7. 首批兼容说明
|
||||
|
||||
ATC 和 NFC 脚本原样保留以下父级编码规则:
|
||||
|
||||
- ATC 2 级关联 1 级:取前 1 位。
|
||||
- ATC 3 级关联 2 级:取前 3 位。
|
||||
- ATC 4 级关联 3 级:取前 4 位。
|
||||
- NFC 2 级关联 1 级:取前 1 位。
|
||||
- NFC 3 级关联 2 级:取前 2 位。
|
||||
|
||||
任何口径简化都应先用生产样本验证这些规则。
|
||||
|
||||
首批上线前运行 `validation/chpa/01_dwd/validate_hierarchy_refactor.sql`。新旧双向差集必须为 0,行数必须一致;重复路径和未匹配层级作为业务 review 指标记录,不在未确认阈值前自动判定失败。
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,86 @@
|
||||
-- Databricks notebook source
|
||||
-- =============================================================================
|
||||
-- Purpose : Build the flattened IMS ATC level 1-4 hierarchy.
|
||||
-- Source : dwd.dwd_ims_td_therapeutic_class
|
||||
-- Target : dwd.dwd_ims_atc_hierarchy
|
||||
-- Grain : One row per hierarchy path rooted at ATC1_CODE; lower levels may be null.
|
||||
-- Write mode : Full refresh (INSERT OVERWRITE).
|
||||
-- Downstream : dwd.dwd_ims_td_pack_property, dws.dws_ims_td_atc_cn
|
||||
-- Notes : Parent-code matching is preserved from the legacy script.
|
||||
-- =============================================================================
|
||||
|
||||
INSERT OVERWRITE TABLE dwd.dwd_ims_atc_hierarchy (
|
||||
ATC1_ID,
|
||||
ATC1_CODE,
|
||||
ATC1_DES,
|
||||
ATC2_ID,
|
||||
ATC2_CODE,
|
||||
ATC2_DES,
|
||||
ATC3_ID,
|
||||
ATC3_CODE,
|
||||
ATC3_DES,
|
||||
ATC4_ID,
|
||||
ATC4_CODE,
|
||||
ATC4_DES
|
||||
)
|
||||
WITH therapeutic_class AS (
|
||||
SELECT
|
||||
therapeutic_id,
|
||||
therapeutic_code,
|
||||
therapeutic_name,
|
||||
therapeutic_level
|
||||
FROM dwd.dwd_ims_td_therapeutic_class
|
||||
),
|
||||
atc_level_1 AS (
|
||||
SELECT
|
||||
therapeutic_id AS atc1_id,
|
||||
therapeutic_code AS atc1_code,
|
||||
therapeutic_name AS atc1_des
|
||||
FROM therapeutic_class
|
||||
WHERE therapeutic_level = '1'
|
||||
),
|
||||
atc_level_2 AS (
|
||||
SELECT
|
||||
therapeutic_id AS atc2_id,
|
||||
therapeutic_code AS atc2_code,
|
||||
therapeutic_name AS atc2_des
|
||||
FROM therapeutic_class
|
||||
WHERE therapeutic_level = '2'
|
||||
),
|
||||
atc_level_3 AS (
|
||||
SELECT
|
||||
therapeutic_id AS atc3_id,
|
||||
therapeutic_code AS atc3_code,
|
||||
therapeutic_name AS atc3_des
|
||||
FROM therapeutic_class
|
||||
WHERE therapeutic_level = '3'
|
||||
),
|
||||
atc_level_4 AS (
|
||||
SELECT
|
||||
therapeutic_id AS atc4_id,
|
||||
therapeutic_code AS atc4_code,
|
||||
therapeutic_name AS atc4_des
|
||||
FROM therapeutic_class
|
||||
WHERE therapeutic_level = '4'
|
||||
)
|
||||
SELECT
|
||||
atc_level_1.atc1_id,
|
||||
atc_level_1.atc1_code,
|
||||
atc_level_1.atc1_des,
|
||||
atc_level_2.atc2_id,
|
||||
atc_level_2.atc2_code,
|
||||
atc_level_2.atc2_des,
|
||||
atc_level_3.atc3_id,
|
||||
atc_level_3.atc3_code,
|
||||
atc_level_3.atc3_des,
|
||||
atc_level_4.atc4_id,
|
||||
atc_level_4.atc4_code,
|
||||
atc_level_4.atc4_des
|
||||
FROM atc_level_1
|
||||
LEFT JOIN atc_level_2
|
||||
ON atc_level_1.atc1_code = LEFT(atc_level_2.atc2_code, 1)
|
||||
LEFT JOIN atc_level_3
|
||||
ON atc_level_2.atc2_code = LEFT(atc_level_3.atc3_code, 3)
|
||||
LEFT JOIN atc_level_4
|
||||
ON atc_level_3.atc3_code = LEFT(atc_level_4.atc4_code, 4)
|
||||
;
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,70 @@
|
||||
-- Databricks notebook source
|
||||
-- =============================================================================
|
||||
-- Purpose : Build the flattened IMS NFC level 1-3 hierarchy.
|
||||
-- Source : dwd.dwd_ims_td_new_form_class
|
||||
-- Target : dwd.dwd_ims_nfc_hierarchy
|
||||
-- Grain : One row per hierarchy path rooted at NFC1_CODE; lower levels may be null.
|
||||
-- Write mode : Full refresh (INSERT OVERWRITE).
|
||||
-- Downstream : dwd.dwd_ims_td_pack_property, dws.dws_ims_td_nfc_cn
|
||||
-- Notes : Parent-code matching is preserved from the legacy script.
|
||||
-- =============================================================================
|
||||
|
||||
INSERT OVERWRITE TABLE dwd.dwd_ims_nfc_hierarchy (
|
||||
NFC1_ID,
|
||||
NFC1_CODE,
|
||||
NFC1_DES,
|
||||
NFC2_ID,
|
||||
NFC2_CODE,
|
||||
NFC2_DES,
|
||||
NFC3_ID,
|
||||
NFC3_CODE,
|
||||
NFC3_DES
|
||||
)
|
||||
WITH new_form_class AS (
|
||||
SELECT
|
||||
newformclass_id,
|
||||
newformclass_code,
|
||||
newformclass_name,
|
||||
newformclass_level
|
||||
FROM dwd.dwd_ims_td_new_form_class
|
||||
),
|
||||
nfc_level_1 AS (
|
||||
SELECT
|
||||
newformclass_id AS nfc1_id,
|
||||
newformclass_code AS nfc1_code,
|
||||
newformclass_name AS nfc1_des
|
||||
FROM new_form_class
|
||||
WHERE newformclass_level = '1'
|
||||
),
|
||||
nfc_level_2 AS (
|
||||
SELECT
|
||||
newformclass_id AS nfc2_id,
|
||||
newformclass_code AS nfc2_code,
|
||||
newformclass_name AS nfc2_des
|
||||
FROM new_form_class
|
||||
WHERE newformclass_level = '2'
|
||||
),
|
||||
nfc_level_3 AS (
|
||||
SELECT
|
||||
newformclass_id AS nfc3_id,
|
||||
newformclass_code AS nfc3_code,
|
||||
newformclass_name AS nfc3_des
|
||||
FROM new_form_class
|
||||
WHERE newformclass_level = '3'
|
||||
)
|
||||
SELECT
|
||||
nfc_level_1.nfc1_id,
|
||||
nfc_level_1.nfc1_code,
|
||||
nfc_level_1.nfc1_des,
|
||||
nfc_level_2.nfc2_id,
|
||||
nfc_level_2.nfc2_code,
|
||||
nfc_level_2.nfc2_des,
|
||||
nfc_level_3.nfc3_id,
|
||||
nfc_level_3.nfc3_code,
|
||||
nfc_level_3.nfc3_des
|
||||
FROM nfc_level_1
|
||||
LEFT JOIN nfc_level_2
|
||||
ON nfc_level_1.nfc1_code = LEFT(nfc_level_2.nfc2_code, 1)
|
||||
LEFT JOIN nfc_level_3
|
||||
ON nfc_level_2.nfc2_code = LEFT(nfc_level_3.nfc3_code, 2)
|
||||
;
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,263 @@
|
||||
-- Databricks notebook source
|
||||
-- MAGIC %md
|
||||
-- MAGIC # ATC/NFC hierarchy refactor validation
|
||||
-- MAGIC Run this notebook before executing the refactored overwrite scripts.
|
||||
-- MAGIC The legacy targets and source tables must represent the same data snapshot.
|
||||
|
||||
-- COMMAND ----------
|
||||
|
||||
-- Confirm the ATC target contains the expected 12 non-partition output columns.
|
||||
DESCRIBE TABLE dwd.dwd_ims_atc_hierarchy;
|
||||
|
||||
-- COMMAND ----------
|
||||
|
||||
-- Confirm the NFC target contains the expected 9 non-partition output columns.
|
||||
DESCRIBE TABLE dwd.dwd_ims_nfc_hierarchy;
|
||||
|
||||
-- COMMAND ----------
|
||||
|
||||
CREATE OR REPLACE TEMP VIEW validation_atc_hierarchy_candidate AS
|
||||
WITH therapeutic_class AS (
|
||||
SELECT
|
||||
therapeutic_id,
|
||||
therapeutic_code,
|
||||
therapeutic_name,
|
||||
therapeutic_level
|
||||
FROM dwd.dwd_ims_td_therapeutic_class
|
||||
),
|
||||
atc_level_1 AS (
|
||||
SELECT
|
||||
therapeutic_id AS atc1_id,
|
||||
therapeutic_code AS atc1_code,
|
||||
therapeutic_name AS atc1_des
|
||||
FROM therapeutic_class
|
||||
WHERE therapeutic_level = '1'
|
||||
),
|
||||
atc_level_2 AS (
|
||||
SELECT
|
||||
therapeutic_id AS atc2_id,
|
||||
therapeutic_code AS atc2_code,
|
||||
therapeutic_name AS atc2_des
|
||||
FROM therapeutic_class
|
||||
WHERE therapeutic_level = '2'
|
||||
),
|
||||
atc_level_3 AS (
|
||||
SELECT
|
||||
therapeutic_id AS atc3_id,
|
||||
therapeutic_code AS atc3_code,
|
||||
therapeutic_name AS atc3_des
|
||||
FROM therapeutic_class
|
||||
WHERE therapeutic_level = '3'
|
||||
),
|
||||
atc_level_4 AS (
|
||||
SELECT
|
||||
therapeutic_id AS atc4_id,
|
||||
therapeutic_code AS atc4_code,
|
||||
therapeutic_name AS atc4_des
|
||||
FROM therapeutic_class
|
||||
WHERE therapeutic_level = '4'
|
||||
)
|
||||
SELECT
|
||||
atc_level_1.atc1_id AS ATC1_ID,
|
||||
atc_level_1.atc1_code AS ATC1_CODE,
|
||||
atc_level_1.atc1_des AS ATC1_DES,
|
||||
atc_level_2.atc2_id AS ATC2_ID,
|
||||
atc_level_2.atc2_code AS ATC2_CODE,
|
||||
atc_level_2.atc2_des AS ATC2_DES,
|
||||
atc_level_3.atc3_id AS ATC3_ID,
|
||||
atc_level_3.atc3_code AS ATC3_CODE,
|
||||
atc_level_3.atc3_des AS ATC3_DES,
|
||||
atc_level_4.atc4_id AS ATC4_ID,
|
||||
atc_level_4.atc4_code AS ATC4_CODE,
|
||||
atc_level_4.atc4_des AS ATC4_DES
|
||||
FROM atc_level_1
|
||||
LEFT JOIN atc_level_2
|
||||
ON atc_level_1.atc1_code = LEFT(atc_level_2.atc2_code, 1)
|
||||
LEFT JOIN atc_level_3
|
||||
ON atc_level_2.atc2_code = LEFT(atc_level_3.atc3_code, 3)
|
||||
LEFT JOIN atc_level_4
|
||||
ON atc_level_3.atc3_code = LEFT(atc_level_4.atc4_code, 4)
|
||||
;
|
||||
|
||||
-- COMMAND ----------
|
||||
|
||||
CREATE OR REPLACE TEMP VIEW validation_nfc_hierarchy_candidate AS
|
||||
WITH new_form_class AS (
|
||||
SELECT
|
||||
newformclass_id,
|
||||
newformclass_code,
|
||||
newformclass_name,
|
||||
newformclass_level
|
||||
FROM dwd.dwd_ims_td_new_form_class
|
||||
),
|
||||
nfc_level_1 AS (
|
||||
SELECT
|
||||
newformclass_id AS nfc1_id,
|
||||
newformclass_code AS nfc1_code,
|
||||
newformclass_name AS nfc1_des
|
||||
FROM new_form_class
|
||||
WHERE newformclass_level = '1'
|
||||
),
|
||||
nfc_level_2 AS (
|
||||
SELECT
|
||||
newformclass_id AS nfc2_id,
|
||||
newformclass_code AS nfc2_code,
|
||||
newformclass_name AS nfc2_des
|
||||
FROM new_form_class
|
||||
WHERE newformclass_level = '2'
|
||||
),
|
||||
nfc_level_3 AS (
|
||||
SELECT
|
||||
newformclass_id AS nfc3_id,
|
||||
newformclass_code AS nfc3_code,
|
||||
newformclass_name AS nfc3_des
|
||||
FROM new_form_class
|
||||
WHERE newformclass_level = '3'
|
||||
)
|
||||
SELECT
|
||||
nfc_level_1.nfc1_id AS NFC1_ID,
|
||||
nfc_level_1.nfc1_code AS NFC1_CODE,
|
||||
nfc_level_1.nfc1_des AS NFC1_DES,
|
||||
nfc_level_2.nfc2_id AS NFC2_ID,
|
||||
nfc_level_2.nfc2_code AS NFC2_CODE,
|
||||
nfc_level_2.nfc2_des AS NFC2_DES,
|
||||
nfc_level_3.nfc3_id AS NFC3_ID,
|
||||
nfc_level_3.nfc3_code AS NFC3_CODE,
|
||||
nfc_level_3.nfc3_des AS NFC3_DES
|
||||
FROM nfc_level_1
|
||||
LEFT JOIN nfc_level_2
|
||||
ON nfc_level_1.nfc1_code = LEFT(nfc_level_2.nfc2_code, 1)
|
||||
LEFT JOIN nfc_level_3
|
||||
ON nfc_level_2.nfc2_code = LEFT(nfc_level_3.nfc3_code, 2)
|
||||
;
|
||||
|
||||
-- COMMAND ----------
|
||||
|
||||
-- Every check must return passed = true before replacing the scheduled jobs.
|
||||
WITH compatibility_checks AS (
|
||||
SELECT
|
||||
'atc_row_count' AS check_name,
|
||||
(SELECT COUNT(*) FROM validation_atc_hierarchy_candidate) AS actual_value,
|
||||
(SELECT COUNT(*) FROM dwd.dwd_ims_atc_hierarchy) AS expected_value
|
||||
UNION ALL
|
||||
SELECT
|
||||
'atc_legacy_minus_candidate' AS check_name,
|
||||
(
|
||||
SELECT COUNT(*)
|
||||
FROM (
|
||||
SELECT * FROM dwd.dwd_ims_atc_hierarchy
|
||||
EXCEPT ALL
|
||||
SELECT * FROM validation_atc_hierarchy_candidate
|
||||
) AS differences
|
||||
) AS actual_value,
|
||||
0 AS expected_value
|
||||
UNION ALL
|
||||
SELECT
|
||||
'atc_candidate_minus_legacy' AS check_name,
|
||||
(
|
||||
SELECT COUNT(*)
|
||||
FROM (
|
||||
SELECT * FROM validation_atc_hierarchy_candidate
|
||||
EXCEPT ALL
|
||||
SELECT * FROM dwd.dwd_ims_atc_hierarchy
|
||||
) AS differences
|
||||
) AS actual_value,
|
||||
0 AS expected_value
|
||||
UNION ALL
|
||||
SELECT
|
||||
'nfc_row_count' AS check_name,
|
||||
(SELECT COUNT(*) FROM validation_nfc_hierarchy_candidate) AS actual_value,
|
||||
(SELECT COUNT(*) FROM dwd.dwd_ims_nfc_hierarchy) AS expected_value
|
||||
UNION ALL
|
||||
SELECT
|
||||
'nfc_legacy_minus_candidate' AS check_name,
|
||||
(
|
||||
SELECT COUNT(*)
|
||||
FROM (
|
||||
SELECT * FROM dwd.dwd_ims_nfc_hierarchy
|
||||
EXCEPT ALL
|
||||
SELECT * FROM validation_nfc_hierarchy_candidate
|
||||
) AS differences
|
||||
) AS actual_value,
|
||||
0 AS expected_value
|
||||
UNION ALL
|
||||
SELECT
|
||||
'nfc_candidate_minus_legacy' AS check_name,
|
||||
(
|
||||
SELECT COUNT(*)
|
||||
FROM (
|
||||
SELECT * FROM validation_nfc_hierarchy_candidate
|
||||
EXCEPT ALL
|
||||
SELECT * FROM dwd.dwd_ims_nfc_hierarchy
|
||||
) AS differences
|
||||
) AS actual_value,
|
||||
0 AS expected_value
|
||||
)
|
||||
SELECT
|
||||
check_name,
|
||||
actual_value,
|
||||
expected_value,
|
||||
actual_value = expected_value AS passed
|
||||
FROM compatibility_checks
|
||||
ORDER BY check_name;
|
||||
|
||||
-- COMMAND ----------
|
||||
|
||||
-- Profile duplicates and unmatched levels. These are review metrics, not automatic failures.
|
||||
WITH atc_duplicate_paths AS (
|
||||
SELECT COUNT(*) AS path_count
|
||||
FROM validation_atc_hierarchy_candidate
|
||||
GROUP BY ATC1_CODE, ATC2_CODE, ATC3_CODE, ATC4_CODE
|
||||
HAVING COUNT(*) > 1
|
||||
),
|
||||
nfc_duplicate_paths AS (
|
||||
SELECT COUNT(*) AS path_count
|
||||
FROM validation_nfc_hierarchy_candidate
|
||||
GROUP BY NFC1_CODE, NFC2_CODE, NFC3_CODE
|
||||
HAVING COUNT(*) > 1
|
||||
)
|
||||
SELECT
|
||||
'atc_duplicate_path_rows' AS metric_name,
|
||||
COALESCE(SUM(path_count - 1), 0) AS metric_value
|
||||
FROM atc_duplicate_paths
|
||||
UNION ALL
|
||||
SELECT
|
||||
'atc_null_root_code' AS metric_name,
|
||||
COUNT_IF(ATC1_CODE IS NULL) AS metric_value
|
||||
FROM validation_atc_hierarchy_candidate
|
||||
UNION ALL
|
||||
SELECT
|
||||
'atc_unmatched_level_2' AS metric_name,
|
||||
COUNT_IF(ATC2_CODE IS NULL) AS metric_value
|
||||
FROM validation_atc_hierarchy_candidate
|
||||
UNION ALL
|
||||
SELECT
|
||||
'atc_unmatched_level_3' AS metric_name,
|
||||
COUNT_IF(ATC3_CODE IS NULL) AS metric_value
|
||||
FROM validation_atc_hierarchy_candidate
|
||||
UNION ALL
|
||||
SELECT
|
||||
'atc_unmatched_level_4' AS metric_name,
|
||||
COUNT_IF(ATC4_CODE IS NULL) AS metric_value
|
||||
FROM validation_atc_hierarchy_candidate
|
||||
UNION ALL
|
||||
SELECT
|
||||
'nfc_duplicate_path_rows' AS metric_name,
|
||||
COALESCE(SUM(path_count - 1), 0) AS metric_value
|
||||
FROM nfc_duplicate_paths
|
||||
UNION ALL
|
||||
SELECT
|
||||
'nfc_null_root_code' AS metric_name,
|
||||
COUNT_IF(NFC1_CODE IS NULL) AS metric_value
|
||||
FROM validation_nfc_hierarchy_candidate
|
||||
UNION ALL
|
||||
SELECT
|
||||
'nfc_unmatched_level_2' AS metric_name,
|
||||
COUNT_IF(NFC2_CODE IS NULL) AS metric_value
|
||||
FROM validation_nfc_hierarchy_candidate
|
||||
UNION ALL
|
||||
SELECT
|
||||
'nfc_unmatched_level_3' AS metric_name,
|
||||
COUNT_IF(NFC3_CODE IS NULL) AS metric_value
|
||||
FROM validation_nfc_hierarchy_candidate
|
||||
ORDER BY metric_name;
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user